CVE-2022-36056 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2022-36056
Vulnerability Scoring

5.5
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2022-36056 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Local
    Vulnerability requires local system access.
  • Privileges Required: Low
    Some privileges are necessary to exploit the vulnerability.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2022-36056 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕖 21 Nov 2024, 07:12 UTC
Originally published on: 🕗 14 Sep 2022, 20:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 798 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

security-advisories@github.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

CVE-2022-36056 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2022-36056: Cosign is a project under the sigstore organization which aims to make signatures invisible infrastructure. In versions prior to 1.12.0 a number of vulnerabilities have been found in cosign verify-blob, where Cosign would successfully verify an artifact when verification should have failed. First a cosign bundle can be crafted to successfully verify a blob even if the embedded rekorBundle does not reference the given signature. Second, when providing identity flags, the email and issuer of a certificate is not checked when verifying a Rekor bundle, and the GitHub Actions identity is never checked. Third, providing an invalid Rekor bundle without the experimental flag results in a successful verification. And fourth an invalid transparency log entry will result in immediate success for verification. Details and examples of these issues can be seen in the GHSA-8gw7-4j42-w388 advisory linked. Users are advised to upgrade to 1.12.0. There are no known workarounds for these issues.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2022-36056

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2022-36056 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2022-36056

CVE-2022-36056 presents an accessible attack vector with minimal effort required. Restricting access controls and implementing security updates are critical to reducing exploitation risks.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2022-36056, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2022-36056, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2022-36056 has no significant impact on data confidentiality.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2022-36056 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2022-36056 does not impact system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.044% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 15.52% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 84.48% of others.

CVE-2022-36056 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-347

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Padding Oracle Crypto Attack CAPEC-463 An adversary is able to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key if a target system leaks data on whether or not a padding error happened while decrypting the ciphertext. A target system that leaks this type of information becomes the padding oracle and an adversary is able to make use of that oracle to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key by issuing on average 128*b calls to the padding oracle (where b is the number of bytes in the ciphertext block). In addition to performing decryption, an adversary is also able to produce valid ciphertexts (i.e., perform encryption) by using the padding oracle, all without knowing the encryption key.
  • Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation CAPEC-475 An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:0.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.10.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.10.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.10.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.10.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.11.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:cosign:1.11.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2022-36056: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-26205 – Lua 5.4.7, when the debug library is used, has a out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in mainpositionTV in ltable.c. NOTE: this is dispute...
  • CVE-2025-26204 – Lua 5.4.7, when the debug library is used, has a out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in equalkey in ltable.c. NOTE: this is disputed beca...
  • CVE-2025-2129 – A vulnerability was found in Mage AI 0.9.75. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to insecur...
  • CVE-2025-2127 – A vulnerability was found in JoomlaUX JUX Real Estate 3.4.0 on Joomla. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of th...
  • CVE-2025-2126 – A vulnerability was found in JoomlaUX JUX Real Estate 3.4.0 on Joomla and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the...