CVE-2022-1434 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2022-1434
Vulnerability Scoring

5.9
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2022-1434 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: High
    Exploits require significant effort and special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2022-1434 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕡 21 Nov 2024, 06:40 UTC
Originally published on: 🕓 03 May 2022, 16:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 932 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

CVE-2022-1434 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2022-1434: The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2022-1434

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2022-1434 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2022-1434

CVE-2022-1434 presents a challenge to exploit due to its high attack complexity, but the absence of privilege requirements still makes it a viable target for skilled attackers. A thorough security review is advised.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2022-1434, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2022-1434, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2022-1434 has no significant impact on data confidentiality.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2022-1434 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2022-1434 does not impact system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.13% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 49.35% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 50.65% of others.

CVE-2022-1434 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-327

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Encryption Brute Forcing CAPEC-20 An attacker, armed with the cipher text and the encryption algorithm used, performs an exhaustive (brute force) search on the key space to determine the key that decrypts the cipher text to obtain the plaintext.
  • Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate CAPEC-459 An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
  • Signature Spoof CAPEC-473 An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
  • Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation CAPEC-475 An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.
  • Cryptanalysis of Cellular Encryption CAPEC-608 The use of cryptanalytic techniques to derive cryptographic keys or otherwise effectively defeat cellular encryption to reveal traffic content. Some cellular encryption algorithms such as A5/1 and A5/2 (specified for GSM use) are known to be vulnerable to such attacks and commercial tools are available to execute these attacks and decrypt mobile phone conversations in real-time. Newer encryption algorithms in use by UMTS and LTE are stronger and currently believed to be less vulnerable to these types of attacks. Note, however, that an attacker with a Cellular Rogue Base Station can force the use of weak cellular encryption even by newer mobile devices.
  • Rooting SIM Cards CAPEC-614 SIM cards are the de facto trust anchor of mobile devices worldwide. The cards protect the mobile identity of subscribers, associate devices with phone numbers, and increasingly store payment credentials, for example in NFC-enabled phones with mobile wallets. This attack leverages over-the-air (OTA) updates deployed via cryptographically-secured SMS messages to deliver executable code to the SIM. By cracking the DES key, an attacker can send properly signed binary SMS messages to a device, which are treated as Java applets and are executed on the SIM. These applets are allowed to send SMS, change voicemail numbers, and query the phone location, among many other predefined functions. These capabilities alone provide plenty of potential for abuse.
  • Cryptanalysis CAPEC-97 Cryptanalysis is a process of finding weaknesses in cryptographic algorithms and using these weaknesses to decipher the ciphertext without knowing the secret key (instance deduction). Sometimes the weakness is not in the cryptographic algorithm itself, but rather in how it is applied that makes cryptanalysis successful. An attacker may have other goals as well, such as: Total Break (finding the secret key), Global Deduction (finding a functionally equivalent algorithm for encryption and decryption that does not require knowledge of the secret key), Information Deduction (gaining some information about plaintexts or ciphertexts that was not previously known) and Distinguishing Algorithm (the attacker has the ability to distinguish the output of the encryption (ciphertext) from a random permutation of bits).

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:beta2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:beta2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha10:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha10:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha11:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha11:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha12:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha12:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha13:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha13:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha14:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha14:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha15:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha15:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha16:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha16:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha17:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha17:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha3:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha4:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha4:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha5:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha5:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha6:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha6:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha7:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha7:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha8:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha8:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha9:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:alpha9:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager:-:*:*:*:*:vsphere:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:netapp:active_iq_unified_manager:-:*:*:*:*:vsphere:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:netapp:clustered_data_ontap:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:netapp:clustered_data_ontap:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:netapp:clustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connector:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:netapp:clustered_data_ontap_antivirus_connector:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:netapp:santricity_smi-s_provider:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:netapp:santricity_smi-s_provider:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:netapp:smi-s_provider:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:netapp:smi-s_provider:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapmanager:-:*:*:*:*:hyper-v:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapmanager:-:*:*:*:*:hyper-v:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:netapp:solidfire\,_enterprise_sds_\&_hci_storage_node:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:netapp:solidfire\,_enterprise_sds_\&_hci_storage_node:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:netapp:solidfire_\&_hci_management_node:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:netapp:solidfire_\&_hci_management_node:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:a700s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:a700s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:a700s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:a700s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h300s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h300s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h300s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h300s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h500s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h500s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h500s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h500s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h700s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h700s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h700s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h700s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h300e_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h300e_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h300e:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h300e:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h500e_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h500e_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h500e:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h500e:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h700e_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h700e_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h700e:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h700e:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h410s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:h410s_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h410s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:h410s:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:aff_8300_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:aff_8300_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:aff_8300:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:aff_8300:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:fas_8300_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:fas_8300_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:fas_8300:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:fas_8300:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:aff_8700_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:aff_8700_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:aff_8700:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:aff_8700:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:fas_8700_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:fas_8700_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:fas_8700:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:fas_8700:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:aff_a400_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:aff_a400_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:aff_a400:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:aff_a400:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:fabric-attached_storage_a400_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:fabric-attached_storage_a400_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:fabric-attached_storage_a400:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:fabric-attached_storage_a400:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:a250_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:a250_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:a250:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:a250:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:aff_500f_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:aff_500f_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:aff_500f:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:aff_500f:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:netapp:fas_500f_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:netapp:fas_500f_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:netapp:fas_500f:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:netapp:fas_500f:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2022-1434: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-26205 – Lua 5.4.7, when the debug library is used, has a out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in mainpositionTV in ltable.c. NOTE: this is dispute...
  • CVE-2025-26204 – Lua 5.4.7, when the debug library is used, has a out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in equalkey in ltable.c. NOTE: this is disputed beca...
  • CVE-2025-2129 – A vulnerability was found in Mage AI 0.9.75. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to insecur...
  • CVE-2025-2127 – A vulnerability was found in JoomlaUX JUX Real Estate 3.4.0 on Joomla. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of th...
  • CVE-2025-2126 – A vulnerability was found in JoomlaUX JUX Real Estate 3.4.0 on Joomla and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the...