CVE-2020-3384 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2020-3384
Vulnerability Scoring

8.2
/10
Severe Risk

Cybersecurity professionals consider CVE-2020-3384 an immediate threat requiring urgent mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: Low
    Some privileges are necessary to exploit the vulnerability.
  • Scope: Changed
    Successful exploitation can impact components beyond the vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: Required
    User interaction is necessary for successful exploitation.

CVE-2020-3384 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕒 17 Jun 2026, 03:18 UTC
Originally published on: 🕛 31 Jul 2020, 00:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 2147 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

psirt@cisco.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L

CVE-2020-3384 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2020-3384: A vulnerability in specific REST API endpoints of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to inject arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the logged-in user. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input to the API. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to the API. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to inject arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2020-3384

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2020-3384 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2020-3384

CVE-2020-3384 presents an accessible attack vector with minimal effort required. Restricting access controls and implementing security updates are critical to reducing exploitation risks.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2020-3384, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2020-3384, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2020-3384 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: Low
    Exploiting CVE-2020-3384 may cause minor changes to data without severely impacting its accuracy.
  • Availability: Low
    CVE-2020-3384 may slightly degrade system performance without fully affecting service availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.188% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 57.24% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 42.76% of others.

CVE-2020-3384 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

NVD-CWE-Other

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:5.2\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:5.2\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.2\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.2\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.3\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.3\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.3\(1\)s3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.3\(1\)s3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.4\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.4\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.4\(1.128\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.4\(1.128\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.4\(2\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:10.4\(2\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:11.0\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:11.0\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:11.1\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:11.1\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:11.2\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:11.2\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:11.3\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:data_center_network_manager:11.3\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2020-3384: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2026-12243 – NLTK version 3.9.4 is vulnerable to a path traversal attack due to an incomplete fix for GitHub Issue #3504. The `_UNSAFE_NO_PROTOCOL_RE` regex in ...
  • CVE-2026-8023 – Zephyr's HTTP server (subsys/net/lib/http) provides a static-filesystem resource type (HTTP_RESOURCE_TYPE_STATIC_FS, available when CONFIG_FILE_SYS...
  • CVE-2026-7656 – The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery handlers in subsys/net/ip/ipv6_nbr.c (handle_ra_input, handle_ns_input, handle_na_input) used an incorrect boolean expr...
  • CVE-2026-51219 – A heap buffer overflow in the HighPriorityASDUQueue_hasUnconfirmedIMessages function of lib60870 v2.3.3 to v2.3.6 allows attackers to cause a Denia...
  • CVE-2026-51218 – A heap buffer overflow in the TS7Worker::PerformFunctionWrite() function (/core/s7_server.cpp) of snap7 v1.4.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial o...