CVE-2020-25232 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

Status: Analyzed - Last modified: 16 Dec 2020, 17:44 UTC Published: 14 Dec 2020, 21:15 UTC

CVE-2020-25232
Vulnerability Scoring

7.5
/10

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low Impact
  • Attack Vector: NETWORK
  • Privileges Required: None
  • Scope: UNCHANGED
  • User Interaction: NONE

CIA Impact Definition

  • Confidentiality: HIGH IMPACT
  • Integrity:
  • Availability:

CVE-2020-25232 Vulnerability Summary

A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 8 BM (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V8.3). Due to the usage of an insecure random number generation function and a deprecated cryptographic function, an attacker could extract the key that is used when communicating with an affected device on port 8080/tcp.

Access Complexity Graph

Above is the Access Complexity Graph for CVE-2020-25232. It helps visualize the difficulty level and privilege requirements needed to exploit this vulnerability, providing a quick assessment of its exploitation feasibility.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2020-25232, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2020-25232, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.129% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 48.99% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 51.01% of others.

CVE-2020-25232 Detailed Information and External References

References

CWE

CWE-327

CAPEC

  • Encryption Brute Forcing CAPEC-20 An attacker, armed with the cipher text and the encryption algorithm used, performs an exhaustive (brute force) search on the key space to determine the key that decrypts the cipher text to obtain the plaintext.
  • Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate CAPEC-459 An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
  • Signature Spoof CAPEC-473 An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
  • Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation CAPEC-475 An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.
  • Cryptanalysis of Cellular Encryption CAPEC-608 The use of cryptanalytic techniques to derive cryptographic keys or otherwise effectively defeat cellular encryption to reveal traffic content. Some cellular encryption algorithms such as A5/1 and A5/2 (specified for GSM use) are known to be vulnerable to such attacks and commercial tools are available to execute these attacks and decrypt mobile phone conversations in real-time. Newer encryption algorithms in use by UMTS and LTE are stronger and currently believed to be less vulnerable to these types of attacks. Note, however, that an attacker with a Cellular Rogue Base Station can force the use of weak cellular encryption even by newer mobile devices.
  • Rooting SIM Cards CAPEC-614 SIM cards are the de facto trust anchor of mobile devices worldwide. The cards protect the mobile identity of subscribers, associate devices with phone numbers, and increasingly store payment credentials, for example in NFC-enabled phones with mobile wallets. This attack leverages over-the-air (OTA) updates deployed via cryptographically-secured SMS messages to deliver executable code to the SIM. By cracking the DES key, an attacker can send properly signed binary SMS messages to a device, which are treated as Java applets and are executed on the SIM. These applets are allowed to send SMS, change voicemail numbers, and query the phone location, among many other predefined functions. These capabilities alone provide plenty of potential for abuse.
  • Cryptanalysis CAPEC-97 Cryptanalysis is a process of finding weaknesses in cryptographic algorithms and using these weaknesses to decipher the ciphertext without knowing the secret key (instance deduction). Sometimes the weakness is not in the cryptographic algorithm itself, but rather in how it is applied that makes cryptanalysis successful. An attacker may have other goals as well, such as: Total Break (finding the secret key), Global Deduction (finding a functionally equivalent algorithm for encryption and decryption that does not require knowledge of the secret key), Information Deduction (gaining some information about plaintexts or ciphertexts that was not previously known) and Distinguishing Algorithm (the attacker has the ability to distinguish the output of the encryption (ciphertext) from a random permutation of bits).

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.81.01:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.81.01:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.81.03:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.81.03:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.81.04:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.81.04:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.82.01:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.82.01:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.82.02:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.82.02:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.82.03:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.82.03:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.82.04:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:siemens:logo\!_8_bm_firmware:1.82.04:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:siemens:logo\!_8_bm:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:siemens:logo\!_8_bm:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Protect Your Infrastructure: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other Recently Published CVEs

  • CVE-2025-25196 – OpenFGA is a high-performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google Zanzibar. OpenFGA < v1.8.4 (...
  • CVE-2023-51303 – PHPJabbers Event Ticketing System v1.0 is vulnerable to Multiple HTML Injection in the "lid, name, plugin_sms_api_key, plugin_sms_country_code, tit...
  • CVE-2023-51302 – PHPJabbers Hotel Booking System v4.0 is vulnerable to CSV Injection vulnerability which allows an attacker to execute remote code. The vulnerabilit...
  • CVE-2023-51301 – A lack of rate limiting in the "Login Section, Forgot Email" feature of PHPJabbers Hotel Booking System v4.0 allows attackers to send an excessive ...
  • CVE-2023-51300 – PHPJabbers Hotel Booking System v4.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the "name, plugin_sms_api_key, plugin_sms_count...
  • CVE-2023-51299 – PHPJabbers Hotel Booking System v4.0 is vulnerable to HTML Injection in the "name, plugin_sms_api_key, plugin_sms_country_code, title, plugin_sms_a...
  • CVE-2023-51298 – PHPJabbers Event Booking Calendar v4.0 is vulnerable to CSV Injection vulnerability which allows an attacker to execute remote code. The vulnerabil...
  • CVE-2023-51297 – A lack of rate limiting in the 'Email Settings' feature of PHPJabbers Hotel Booking System v4.0 allows attackers to send an excessive amount of ema...
  • CVE-2025-0677 – A flaw was found in grub2. When performing a symlink lookup, the grub's UFS module checks the inode's data size to allocate the internal buffer to ...
  • CVE-2025-0624 – A flaw was found in grub2. During the network boot process, when trying to search for the configuration file, grub copies data from a user controll...