CVE-2019-1715 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2019-1715
Vulnerability Scoring

5.3
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2019-1715 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2019-1715 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕟 21 Nov 2024, 04:37 UTC
Originally published on: 🕔 03 May 2019, 17:29 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 2028 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

ykramarz@cisco.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVE-2019-1715 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2019-1715: A vulnerability in the Deterministic Random Bit Generator (DRBG), also known as Pseudorandom Number Generator (PRNG), used in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a cryptographic collision, enabling the attacker to discover the private key of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient entropy in the DRBG when generating cryptographic keys. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by generating a large number of cryptographic keys on an affected device and looking for collisions with target devices. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to impersonate an affected target device or to decrypt traffic secured by an affected key that is sent to or from an affected target device.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2019-1715

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2019-1715 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2019-1715

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2019-1715 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2019-1715, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2019-1715, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: Low
    CVE-2019-1715 could lead to minor leaks of non-critical information without major privacy breaches.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2019-1715 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2019-1715 does not impact system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.336% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 71.48% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 28.519999999999996% of others.

CVE-2019-1715 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-332

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_device_manager:9.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_device_manager:9.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_device_manager:9.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_device_manager:9.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.3.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.3.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.3.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.3.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5506-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5506-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5506h-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5506h-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5506w-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5506w-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5508-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5508-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5516-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5516-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5525-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5525-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5545-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5545-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5555-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa-5555-x:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa_5500:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asa_5500:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2019-1715: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-26205 – Lua 5.4.7, when the debug library is used, has a out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in mainpositionTV in ltable.c. NOTE: this is dispute...
  • CVE-2025-26204 – Lua 5.4.7, when the debug library is used, has a out-of-bounds read and segmentation violation in equalkey in ltable.c. NOTE: this is disputed beca...
  • CVE-2025-2129 – A vulnerability was found in Mage AI 0.9.75. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to insecur...
  • CVE-2025-2127 – A vulnerability was found in JoomlaUX JUX Real Estate 3.4.0 on Joomla. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of th...
  • CVE-2025-2126 – A vulnerability was found in JoomlaUX JUX Real Estate 3.4.0 on Joomla and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the...