CVE-2018-1818 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2018-1818
Vulnerability Scoring

5.9
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2018-1818 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: High
    Exploits require significant effort and special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Local
    Vulnerability requires local system access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Changed
    Successful exploitation can impact components beyond the vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2018-1818 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕓 21 Nov 2024, 04:00 UTC
Originally published on: 🕓 13 Dec 2018, 16:29 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 2169 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

psirt@us.ibm.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

CVE-2018-1818 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2018-1818: IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-Force ID: 150022.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2018-1818

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2018-1818 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2018-1818

CVE-2018-1818 presents a challenge to exploit due to its high attack complexity, but the absence of privilege requirements still makes it a viable target for skilled attackers. A thorough security review is advised.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2018-1818, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2018-1818, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2018-1818 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2018-1818 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2018-1818 does not impact system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.194% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 58.04% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 41.96% of others.

CVE-2018-1818 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-798

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Read Sensitive Constants Within an Executable CAPEC-191 An adversary engages in activities to discover any sensitive constants present within the compiled code of an executable. These constants may include literal ASCII strings within the file itself, or possibly strings hard-coded into particular routines that can be revealed by code refactoring methods including static and dynamic analysis.
  • Try Common or Default Usernames and Passwords CAPEC-70 An adversary may try certain common or default usernames and passwords to gain access into the system and perform unauthorized actions. An adversary may try an intelligent brute force using empty passwords, known vendor default credentials, as well as a dictionary of common usernames and passwords. Many vendor products come preconfigured with default (and thus well-known) usernames and passwords that should be deleted prior to usage in a production environment. It is a common mistake to forget to remove these default login credentials. Another problem is that users would pick very simple (common) passwords (e.g. "secret" or "password") that make it easier for the attacker to gain access to the system compared to using a brute force attack or even a dictionary attack using a full dictionary.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.01:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.01:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.1.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.1.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:security_guardium:10.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2018-1818: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-33093 – IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.1.0, 6.2.0, 6.2.2 JWT secret is stored in public Helm Charts and is not stored as a Kubernetes secret.
  • CVE-2025-4104 – The Frontend Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation due to a missing capability check on the fed_wp_ajax_fed_login_fo...
  • CVE-2025-39361 – Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WProyal Royal Elementor Addons allows Stored ...
  • CVE-2025-27533 – Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ. During unmarshalling of OpenWire commands the size value of buffers ...
  • CVE-2025-20980 – Out-of-bounds write in libsavscmn prior to Android 15 allows local attackers to cause memory corruption.