CVE-2018-1000054 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2018-1000054
Vulnerability Scoring

8.3
/10
Severe Risk

Cybersecurity professionals consider CVE-2018-1000054 an immediate threat requiring urgent mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: Low
    Some privileges are necessary to exploit the vulnerability.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2018-1000054 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕞 21 Nov 2024, 03:39 UTC
Originally published on: 🕚 09 Feb 2018, 23:29 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 2476 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H

CVE-2018-1000054 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2018-1000054: Jenkins CCM Plugin 3.1 and earlier processes XML external entities in files it parses as part of the build process, allowing attackers with user permissions in Jenkins to extract secrets from the Jenkins master, perform server-side request forgery, or denial-of-service attacks.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2018-1000054

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2018-1000054 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2018-1000054

CVE-2018-1000054 presents an accessible attack vector with minimal effort required. Restricting access controls and implementing security updates are critical to reducing exploitation risks.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2018-1000054, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2018-1000054, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2018-1000054 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: Low
    Exploiting CVE-2018-1000054 may cause minor changes to data without severely impacting its accuracy.
  • Availability: High
    CVE-2018-1000054 can disrupt system operations, potentially causing complete denial of service (DoS).

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.104% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 44.61% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 55.39% of others.

CVE-2018-1000054 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-918

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Server Side Request Forgery CAPEC-664 An adversary exploits improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server, with the goal of forcing the server to make a request either to itself, to web services running in the server’s internal network, or to external third parties. If successful, the adversary’s request will be made with the server’s privilege level, bypassing its authentication controls. This ultimately allows the adversary to access sensitive data, execute commands on the server’s network, and make external requests with the stolen identity of the server. Server Side Request Forgery attacks differ from Cross Site Request Forgery attacks in that they target the server itself, whereas CSRF attacks exploit an insecure user authentication mechanism to perform unauthorized actions on the user's behalf.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:1.0:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:1.0:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:1.0.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:1.0.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:1.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:1.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.0:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.0:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.2:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.2:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.3:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.3:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.4:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.4:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.5:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.5:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.6:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.6:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.6.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:2.6.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:3.0:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:3.0:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:3.0.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:3.0.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:3.0.2:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:3.0.2:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:3.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:jenkins:ccm:3.1:*:*:*:*:jenkins:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2018-1000054: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-3809 – The Debug Log Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the auto-refresh debug log in all versions up to, and i...
  • CVE-2025-2111 – The Insert Headers And Footers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.1. This i...
  • CVE-2024-13926 – The WP-Syntax WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not properly handle input, allowing an attacker to create a post containing a large number of tags,...
  • CVE-2025-3103 – The CLEVER - HTML5 Radio Player With History - Shoutcast and Icecast - Elementor Widget Addon plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file ...
  • CVE-2025-3275 – The Themesflat Addons For Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the TF E Slider widget in all versions up...