CVE-2018-0296 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2018-0296
Vulnerability Scoring

7.5
/10
Very High Risk

Highly exploitable, CVE-2018-0296 poses a critical security risk that could lead to severe breaches.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2018-0296 Details

Status: Analyzed

Last updated: 🕤 27 Jan 2025, 21:31 UTC
Originally published on: 🕛 07 Jun 2018, 12:29 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 2426 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVE-2018-0296 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2018-0296: A vulnerability in the web interface of the Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. It is also possible on certain software releases that the ASA will not reload, but an attacker could view sensitive system information without authentication by using directory traversal techniques. The vulnerability is due to lack of proper input validation of the HTTP URL. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition or unauthenticated disclosure of information. This vulnerability applies to IPv4 and IPv6 HTTP traffic. This vulnerability affects Cisco ASA Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliance (ISA), ASA 1000V Cloud Firewall, ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance (ASAv), Firepower 2100 Series Security Appliance, Firepower 4100 Series Security Appliance, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Module, FTD Virtual (FTDv). Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi16029.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2018-0296

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2018-0296 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2018-0296

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2018-0296 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2018-0296, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2018-0296, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2018-0296 has no significant impact on data confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2018-0296 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: High
    CVE-2018-0296 can disrupt system operations, potentially causing complete denial of service (DoS).

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 97.315% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 99.95% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 0.04999999999999716% of others.

CVE-2018-0296 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-22

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Path Traversal CAPEC-126 An adversary uses path manipulation methods to exploit insufficient input validation of a target to obtain access to data that should be not be retrievable by ordinary well-formed requests. A typical variety of this attack involves specifying a path to a desired file together with dot-dot-slash characters, resulting in the file access API or function traversing out of the intended directory structure and into the root file system. By replacing or modifying the expected path information the access function or API retrieves the file desired by the attacker. These attacks either involve the attacker providing a complete path to a targeted file or using control characters (e.g. path separators (/ or \) and/or dots (.)) to reach desired directories or files.
  • Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic CAPEC-64 This attack targets the encoding of the URL combined with the encoding of the slash characters. An attacker can take advantage of the multiple ways of encoding a URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL. A URL may contain special character that need special syntax handling in order to be interpreted. Special characters are represented using a percentage character followed by two digits representing the octet code of the original character (%HEX-CODE). For instance US-ASCII space character would be represented with %20. This is often referred as escaped ending or percent-encoding. Since the server decodes the URL from the requests, it may restrict the access to some URL paths by validating and filtering out the URL requests it received. An attacker will try to craft an URL with a sequence of special characters which once interpreted by the server will be equivalent to a forbidden URL. It can be difficult to protect against this attack since the URL can contain other format of encoding such as UTF-8 encoding, Unicode-encoding, etc.
  • Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls CAPEC-76 An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.
  • Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding CAPEC-78 This attack targets the use of the backslash in alternate encoding. An adversary can provide a backslash as a leading character and causes a parser to believe that the next character is special. This is called an escape. By using that trick, the adversary tries to exploit alternate ways to encode the same character which leads to filter problems and opens avenues to attack.
  • Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding CAPEC-79 This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An adversary would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the adversary many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:8.1\(2.5\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:8.1\(2.5\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1.4\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1.4\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1.17\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1.17\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)21:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7\(1\)21:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.21:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:adaptive_security_appliance_software:9.7.1.21:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.1.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.1.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.0.1.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3-85.02:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3-85.02:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3-851:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3-851:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:6.2.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2018-0296: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-3275 – The Themesflat Addons For Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the TF E Slider widget in all versions up...
  • CVE-2025-1457 – The Element Pack Addons for Elementor – Free Templates and Widgets for Your WordPress Websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-S...
  • CVE-2025-1093 – The AIHub theme for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the generate_image function in all ver...
  • CVE-2025-3284 – The User Registration & Membership – Custom Registration Form, Login Form, and User Profile plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Reques...
  • CVE-2025-3278 – The UrbanGo Membership plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in versions up to, and including, 1.0.4. This is due to the plugi...