CVE-2017-3907 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2017-3907
Vulnerability Scoring

5.4
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2017-3907 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: High
    Exploits require significant effort and special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Changed
    Successful exploitation can impact components beyond the vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2017-3907 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕒 21 Nov 2024, 03:26 UTC
Originally published on: 🕘 13 Jun 2018, 21:29 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 2352 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

trellixpsirt@trellix.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L

CVE-2017-3907 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2017-3907: Code Injection vulnerability in the ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) extension in McAfee Threat Intelligence Exchange (TIE) Server 2.1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary HTML code to be reflected in the response web page via unspecified vector.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2017-3907

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2017-3907 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2017-3907

CVE-2017-3907 presents a challenge to exploit due to its high attack complexity, but the absence of privilege requirements still makes it a viable target for skilled attackers. A thorough security review is advised.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2017-3907, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2017-3907, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: Low
    CVE-2017-3907 could lead to minor leaks of non-critical information without major privacy breaches.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2017-3907 poses no threat to data integrity.
  • Availability: Low
    CVE-2017-3907 may slightly degrade system performance without fully affecting service availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.35% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 72.12% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 27.879999999999995% of others.

CVE-2017-3907 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-94

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Code Injection CAPEC-242 An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
  • Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files CAPEC-35 An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
  • Manipulating User-Controlled Variables CAPEC-77 This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:mcafee:mcafee_threat_intelligence_exchange:2.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:mcafee:mcafee_threat_intelligence_exchange:2.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2017-3907: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-4432 – A flaw was found in Rust's Ring package. A panic may be triggered when overflow checking is enabled. In the QUIC protocol, this flaw allows an atta...
  • CVE-2025-46193 – SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to Remote code execution via Arbitrary file upload in user_proposal_update_order.php.
  • CVE-2025-46189 – SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in user_order_customer_update.php via the order_id POST parameter.
  • CVE-2025-46188 – SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in superadmin_phpmyadmin.php.
  • CVE-2025-45513 – Tenda FH451 V1.0.0.9 has a stack overflow vulnerability in the function.P2pListFilter.