CVE-2017-17742 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2017-17742
Vulnerability Scoring

5.3
/10
Significant Risk

Security assessments indicate that CVE-2017-17742 presents a notable risk, potentially requiring prompt mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2017-17742 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕒 21 Nov 2024, 03:18 UTC
Originally published on: 🕙 03 Apr 2018, 22:29 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 2423 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

CVE-2017-17742 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2017-17742: Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1 allows an HTTP Response Splitting attack. An attacker can inject a crafted key and value into an HTTP response for the HTTP server of WEBrick.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2017-17742

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2017-17742 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2017-17742

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2017-17742 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2017-17742, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2017-17742, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2017-17742 has no significant impact on data confidentiality.
  • Integrity: Low
    Exploiting CVE-2017-17742 may cause minor changes to data without severely impacting its accuracy.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2017-17742 does not impact system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.569% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 78.2% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 21.799999999999997% of others.

CVE-2017-17742 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-113

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • HTTP Request Splitting CAPEC-105 An adversary abuses the flexibility and discrepancies in the parsing and interpretation of HTTP Request messages by different intermediary HTTP agents (e.g., load balancer, reverse proxy, web caching proxies, application firewalls, etc.) to split a single HTTP request into multiple unauthorized and malicious HTTP requests to a back-end HTTP agent (e.g., web server). See CanPrecede relationships for possible consequences.
  • Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies CAPEC-31 This attack relies on the use of HTTP Cookies to store credentials, state information and other critical data on client systems. There are several different forms of this attack. The first form of this attack involves accessing HTTP Cookies to mine for potentially sensitive data contained therein. The second form involves intercepting this data as it is transmitted from client to server. This intercepted information is then used by the adversary to impersonate the remote user/session. The third form is when the cookie's content is modified by the adversary before it is sent back to the server. Here the adversary seeks to convince the target server to operate on this falsified information.
  • HTTP Response Splitting CAPEC-34 An adversary manipulates and injects malicious content, in the form of secret unauthorized HTTP responses, into a single HTTP response from a vulnerable or compromised back-end HTTP agent (e.g., web server) or into an already spoofed HTTP response from an adversary controlled domain/site. See CanPrecede relationships for possible consequences.
  • AJAX Footprinting CAPEC-85 This attack utilizes the frequent client-server roundtrips in Ajax conversation to scan a system. While Ajax does not open up new vulnerabilities per se, it does optimize them from an attacker point of view. A common first step for an attacker is to footprint the target environment to understand what attacks will work. Since footprinting relies on enumeration, the conversational pattern of rapid, multiple requests and responses that are typical in Ajax applications enable an attacker to look for many vulnerabilities, well-known ports, network locations and so on. The knowledge gained through Ajax fingerprinting can be used to support other attacks, such as XSS.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.0:preview1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.0:preview1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.0:preview2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.0:preview2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.0:preview1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.0:preview1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.0:preview2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.0:preview2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.3.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.0:preview1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.0:preview1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.0:preview2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.0:preview2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.0:preview3:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.0:preview3:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.5.0:preview1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.5.0:preview1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.6.0:preview1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ruby-lang:ruby:2.6.0:preview1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2017-17742: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-3809 – The Debug Log Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the auto-refresh debug log in all versions up to, and i...
  • CVE-2025-2111 – The Insert Headers And Footers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.1. This i...
  • CVE-2024-13926 – The WP-Syntax WordPress plugin through 1.2 does not properly handle input, allowing an attacker to create a post containing a large number of tags,...
  • CVE-2025-3103 – The CLEVER - HTML5 Radio Player With History - Shoutcast and Icecast - Elementor Widget Addon plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file ...
  • CVE-2025-3275 – The Themesflat Addons For Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the TF E Slider widget in all versions up...