CVE-2017-0278 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2017-0278
Vulnerability Scoring

7.0
/10
High Risk

If left unpatched, CVE-2017-0278 could lead to major system disruptions or data loss.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: High
    Exploits require significant effort and special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2017-0278 Details

Status: Deferred

Last updated: 🕜 20 Apr 2025, 01:37 UTC
Originally published on: 🕑 12 May 2017, 14:29 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 2899 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

CVE-2017-0278 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2017-0278: The Microsoft Server Message Block 1.0 (SMBv1) server on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to execute remote code by the way it handles certain requests, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0272, CVE-2017-0277, and CVE-2017-0279.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2017-0278

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2017-0278 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2017-0278

CVE-2017-0278 presents a challenge to exploit due to its high attack complexity, but the absence of privilege requirements still makes it a viable target for skilled attackers. A thorough security review is advised.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2017-0278, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2017-0278, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2017-0278 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: Low
    Exploiting CVE-2017-0278 may cause minor changes to data without severely impacting its accuracy.
  • Availability: Low
    CVE-2017-0278 may slightly degrade system performance without fully affecting service availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 4.647% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 92.67% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 7.329999999999998% of others.

CVE-2017-0278 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

NVD-CWE-noinfo

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:1511:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:1511:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:1607:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:1607:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:1703:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:1703:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_7:*:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_7:*:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_rt_8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_rt_8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008:*:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008:*:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008:r2:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008:r2:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:r2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:r2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2017-0278: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-4432 – A flaw was found in Rust's Ring package. A panic may be triggered when overflow checking is enabled. In the QUIC protocol, this flaw allows an atta...
  • CVE-2025-46193 – SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to Remote code execution via Arbitrary file upload in user_proposal_update_order.php.
  • CVE-2025-46189 – SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in user_order_customer_update.php via the order_id POST parameter.
  • CVE-2025-46188 – SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in superadmin_phpmyadmin.php.
  • CVE-2025-45513 – Tenda FH451 V1.0.0.9 has a stack overflow vulnerability in the function.P2pListFilter.