CVE-2017-0248 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2017-0248
Vulnerability Scoring

7.5
/10
Very High Risk

Highly exploitable, CVE-2017-0248 poses a critical security risk that could lead to severe breaches.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low
    Exploits can be performed without significant complexity or special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2017-0248 Details

Status: Deferred

Last updated: 🕜 20 Apr 2025, 01:37 UTC
Originally published on: 🕑 12 May 2017, 14:29 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 2899 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

CVE-2017-0248 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2017-0248: Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.7 allow an attacker to bypass Enhanced Security Usage taggings when they present a certificate that is invalid for a specific use, aka ".NET Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability."

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2017-0248

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2017-0248 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2017-0248

With low attack complexity and no required privileges, CVE-2017-0248 is an easy target for cybercriminals. Organizations should prioritize immediate mitigation measures to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2017-0248, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2017-0248, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2017-0248 has no significant impact on data confidentiality.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2017-0248 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2017-0248 does not impact system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.366% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 72.72% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 27.28% of others.

CVE-2017-0248 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-295

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate CAPEC-459 An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
  • Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation CAPEC-475 An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:2.0:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:2.0:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:3.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:3.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:4.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:4.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:4.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:4.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:4.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:4.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:.net_framework:4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2017-0248: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-45885 – PHPGURUKUL Vehicle Parking Management System v1.13 is vulnerable to SQL injection in the /vpms/users/login.php file. Attackers can inject malicious...
  • CVE-2024-12442 – EnerSys AMPA versions 24.04 through 24.16, inclusive, are vulnerable to command injection leading to privileged remote shell access.
  • CVE-2024-11861 – EnerSys AMPA 22.09 and prior versions are vulnerable to command injection leading to privileged remote shell access.
  • CVE-2025-4382 – A flaw was found in systems utilizing LUKS-encrypted disks with GRUB configured for TPM-based auto-decryption. When GRUB is set to automatically de...
  • CVE-2025-4206 – The WordPress CRM, Email & Marketing Automation for WordPress | Award Winner — Groundhogg plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file dele...