CVE-2015-10088 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2015-10088
Vulnerability Scoring

8.1
/10
Severe Risk

Cybersecurity professionals consider CVE-2015-10088 an immediate threat requiring urgent mitigation.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: High
    Exploits require significant effort and special conditions.
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No privileges are required for exploitation.
  • Scope: Unchanged
    Exploit remains within the originally vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2015-10088 Details

Status: Modified

Last updated: 🕐 17 May 2024, 01:03 UTC
Originally published on: 🕔 05 Mar 2023, 05:15 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 438 days

CVSS Release: version 3

CVSS3 Source

nvd@nist.gov

CVSS3 Type

Primary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE-2015-10088 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2015-10088: A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in ayttm up to 0.5.0.89. This affects the function http_connect in the library libproxy/proxy.c. The manipulation leads to format string. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The patch is named 40e04680018614a7d2b68566b261b061a0597046. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-222267.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2015-10088

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2015-10088 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2015-10088

CVE-2015-10088 presents a challenge to exploit due to its high attack complexity, but the absence of privilege requirements still makes it a viable target for skilled attackers. A thorough security review is advised.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2015-10088, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2015-10088, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: High
    Exploiting CVE-2015-10088 can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, severely compromising data privacy.
  • Integrity: High
    CVE-2015-10088 could allow unauthorized modifications to data, potentially affecting system reliability and trust.
  • Availability: High
    CVE-2015-10088 can disrupt system operations, potentially causing complete denial of service (DoS).

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 0.202% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 58.75% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 41.25% of others.

CVE-2015-10088 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-134

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Format String Injection CAPEC-135 An adversary includes formatting characters in a string input field on the target application. Most applications assume that users will provide static text and may respond unpredictably to the presence of formatting character. For example, in certain functions of the C programming languages such as printf, the formatting character %s will print the contents of a memory location expecting this location to identify a string and the formatting character %n prints the number of DWORD written in the memory. An adversary can use this to read or write to memory locations or files, or simply to manipulate the value of the resulting text in unexpected ways. Reading or writing memory may result in program crashes and writing memory could result in the execution of arbitrary code if the adversary can write to the program stack.
  • String Format Overflow in syslog() CAPEC-67 This attack targets applications and software that uses the syslog() function insecurely. If an application does not explicitely use a format string parameter in a call to syslog(), user input can be placed in the format string parameter leading to a format string injection attack. Adversaries can then inject malicious format string commands into the function call leading to a buffer overflow. There are many reported software vulnerabilities with the root cause being a misuse of the syslog() function.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.6-17:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.4.6-17:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-111:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-111:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-45:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-45:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-82:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-82:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-89:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ayttm_project:ayttm:0.5.0-89:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2015-10088: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-3805 – A vulnerability classified as critical was found in sarrionandia tournatrack up to 4c13a23f43da5317eea4614870a7a8510fc540ec. Affected by this vulne...
  • CVE-2025-3804 – A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in thautwarm vscode-diana 0.0.1. Affected is an unknown function of the file Gen.py of the co...
  • CVE-2025-3803 – A vulnerability was found in Tenda W12 and i24 3.0.0.4(2887)/3.0.0.5(3644). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function cgiSysSc...
  • CVE-2025-3802 – A vulnerability was found in Tenda W12 and i24 3.0.0.4(2887)/3.0.0.5(3644). It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects the functi...
  • CVE-2025-3801 – A vulnerability was found in songquanpeng one-api up to 0.6.10. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the componen...