CVE-2008-0553 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Details

CVE-2008-0553
Vulnerability Scoring

6.8
/10
High Risk

Without proper mitigation, CVE-2008-0553 could pose a significant security threat.

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Medium
    Attack Complexity Analysis In Progress
  • Attack Vector: Network
    Vulnerability is exploitable over a network without physical access.
  • Privileges Required: None
    No authentication is required for exploitation.
  • Scope:
    Impact is confined to the initially vulnerable component.
  • User Interaction: None
    No user interaction is necessary for exploitation.

CVE-2008-0553 Details

Status: Deferred

Last updated: 🕧 09 Apr 2025, 00:30 UTC
Originally published on: 🕘 07 Feb 2008, 21:00 UTC

Time between publication and last update: 6270 days

CVSS Release: version 2

CVE-2008-0553 Vulnerability Summary

CVE-2008-0553: Stack-based buffer overflow in the ReadImage function in tkImgGIF.c in Tk (Tcl/Tk) before 8.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted GIF image, a similar issue to CVE-2006-4484.

Assessing the Risk of CVE-2008-0553

Access Complexity Graph

The exploitability of CVE-2008-0553 depends on two key factors: attack complexity (the level of effort required to execute an exploit) and privileges required (the access level an attacker needs).

Exploitability Analysis for CVE-2008-0553

Moderate complexity but no authentication required makes CVE-2008-0553 a potential risk.

Understanding AC and PR

A lower complexity and fewer privilege requirements make exploitation easier. Security teams should evaluate these aspects to determine the urgency of mitigation strategies, such as patch management and access control policies.

Attack Complexity (AC) measures the difficulty in executing an exploit. A high AC means that specific conditions must be met, making an attack more challenging, while a low AC means the vulnerability can be exploited with minimal effort.

Privileges Required (PR) determine the level of system access necessary for an attack. Vulnerabilities requiring no privileges are more accessible to attackers, whereas high privilege requirements limit exploitation to authorized users with elevated access.

CVSS Score Breakdown Chart

Above is the CVSS Sub-score Breakdown for CVE-2008-0553, illustrating how Base, Impact, and Exploitability factors combine to form the overall severity rating. A higher sub-score typically indicates a more severe or easier-to-exploit vulnerability.

CIA Impact Analysis

Below is the Impact Analysis for CVE-2008-0553, showing how Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability might be affected if the vulnerability is exploited. Higher values usually signal greater potential damage.

  • Confidentiality: None
    CVE-2008-0553 does not compromise confidentiality.
  • Integrity: None
    CVE-2008-0553 does not impact data integrity.
  • Availability: None
    CVE-2008-0553 does not affect system availability.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

The EPSS score estimates the probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the near future.

EPSS Score: 16.699% (probability of exploit)

EPSS Percentile: 96.13% (lower percentile = lower relative risk)
This vulnerability is less risky than approximately 3.8700000000000045% of others.

CVE-2008-0553 References

External References

CWE Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-119

CAPEC Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables CAPEC-10 This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the adversary finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Overflow Buffers CAPEC-100 Buffer Overflow attacks target improper or missing bounds checking on buffer operations, typically triggered by input injected by an adversary. As a consequence, an adversary is able to write past the boundaries of allocated buffer regions in memory, causing a program crash or potentially redirection of execution as per the adversaries' choice.
  • Buffer Manipulation CAPEC-123 An adversary manipulates an application's interaction with a buffer in an attempt to read or modify data they shouldn't have access to. Buffer attacks are distinguished in that it is the buffer space itself that is the target of the attack rather than any code responsible for interpreting the content of the buffer. In virtually all buffer attacks the content that is placed in the buffer is immaterial. Instead, most buffer attacks involve retrieving or providing more input than can be stored in the allocated buffer, resulting in the reading or overwriting of other unintended program memory.
  • Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow CAPEC-14 This type of attack exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in targeted client software through injection of malicious content from a custom-built hostile service. This hostile service is created to deliver the correct content to the client software. For example, if the client-side application is a browser, the service will host a webpage that the browser loads.
  • Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow CAPEC-24 In this attack, the idea is to cause an active filter to fail by causing an oversized transaction. An attacker may try to feed overly long input strings to the program in an attempt to overwhelm the filter (by causing a buffer overflow) and hoping that the filter does not fail securely (i.e. the user input is let into the system unfiltered).
  • MIME Conversion CAPEC-42 An attacker exploits a weakness in the MIME conversion routine to cause a buffer overflow and gain control over the mail server machine. The MIME system is designed to allow various different information formats to be interpreted and sent via e-mail. Attack points exist when data are converted to MIME compatible format and back.
  • Overflow Binary Resource File CAPEC-44 An attack of this type exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in the handling of binary resources. Binary resources may include music files like MP3, image files like JPEG files, and any other binary file. These attacks may pass unnoticed to the client machine through normal usage of files, such as a browser loading a seemingly innocent JPEG file. This can allow the adversary access to the execution stack and execute arbitrary code in the target process.
  • Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links CAPEC-45 This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An adversary can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
  • Overflow Variables and Tags CAPEC-46 This type of attack leverages the use of tags or variables from a formatted configuration data to cause buffer overflow. The adversary crafts a malicious HTML page or configuration file that includes oversized strings, thus causing an overflow.
  • Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion CAPEC-47 In this attack, the target software is given input that the adversary knows will be modified and expanded in size during processing. This attack relies on the target software failing to anticipate that the expanded data may exceed some internal limit, thereby creating a buffer overflow.
  • Buffer Overflow in an API Call CAPEC-8 This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An adversary who has knowledge of known vulnerable libraries or shared code can easily target software that makes use of these libraries. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.
  • Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities CAPEC-9 This attack targets command-line utilities available in a number of shells. An adversary can leverage a vulnerability found in a command-line utility to escalate privilege to root.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:4.0p1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:4.0p1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.1p1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.1p1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:6.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.5p1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.5p1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.6p2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:7.6p2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.0p2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.0p2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4a2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4a2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4a3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4a3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4a4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4a4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4b1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4b1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4b2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.4b2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5_a3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5_a3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5a6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5b1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5b1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5b2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5b2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5b3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tcl_tk:tcl_tk:8.5b3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Protect Your Infrastructure against CVE-2008-0553: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Other 5 Recently Published CVEs Vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2025-4488 – A vulnerability was found in itsourcecode Gym Management System 1.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown...
  • CVE-2025-4487 – A vulnerability was found in itsourcecode Gym Management System 1.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the fil...
  • CVE-2025-4486 – A vulnerability was found in itsourcecode Gym Management System 1.0 and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the f...
  • CVE-2025-4485 – A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Gym Management System 1.0 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the...
  • CVE-2025-4484 – A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in itsourcecode Gym Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /a...