CVE-2024-53102: Detailed Vulnerability Analysis and Overview

Status: Received - Published on 25-11-2024

CVE-2024-53102
Vulnerability Scoring

Analysis In Progress

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Analysis in progress
  • Attack Vector: Analysis in progress
  • Privileges Required: Analysis in progress

CIA Impact Definition

  • Confidentiality:
  • Integrity:
  • Availability:

CVE-2024-53102 Vulnerability Summary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme: make keep-alive synchronous operation The nvme keep-alive operation, which executes at a periodic interval, could potentially sneak in while shutting down a fabric controller. This may lead to a race between the fabric controller admin queue destroy code path (invoked while shutting down controller) and hw/hctx queue dispatcher called from the nvme keep-alive async request queuing operation. This race could lead to the kernel crash shown below: Call Trace: autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0xbc (unreliable) __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x114/0x24c blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x44/0x84 blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x140/0x220 nvme_keep_alive_work+0xc8/0x19c [nvme_core] process_one_work+0x200/0x4e0 worker_thread+0x340/0x504 kthread+0x138/0x140 start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18 While shutting down fabric controller, if nvme keep-alive request sneaks in then it would be flushed off. The nvme_keep_alive_end_io function is then invoked to handle the end of the keep-alive operation which decrements the admin->q_usage_counter and assuming this is the last/only request in the admin queue then the admin->q_usage_counter becomes zero. If that happens then blk-mq destroy queue operation (blk_mq_destroy_ queue()) which could be potentially running simultaneously on another cpu (as this is the controller shutdown code path) would forward progress and deletes the admin queue. So, now from this point onward we are not supposed to access the admin queue resources. However the issue here's that the nvme keep-alive thread running hw/hctx queue dispatch operation hasn't yet finished its work and so it could still potentially access the admin queue resource while the admin queue had been already deleted and that causes the above crash. This fix helps avoid the observed crash by implementing keep-alive as a synchronous operation so that we decrement admin->q_usage_counter only after keep-alive command finished its execution and returns the command status back up to its caller (blk_execute_rq()). This would ensure that fabric shutdown code path doesn't destroy the fabric admin queue until keep-alive request finished execution and also keep-alive thread is not running hw/hctx queue dispatch operation.

Access Complexity Graph for CVE-2024-53102

Impact Analysis for CVE-2024-53102

CVE-2024-53102: Detailed Information and External References

EPSS

0.00045

EPSS %

0.17645

References

0.00045

CWE

Unknown

Protect Your Infrastructure: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Advance your expertise with certifications like Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH) and CISSP ISC2. These certifications equip you with proactive strategies to address vulnerabilities and strengthen your organization's defenses against emerging cyber threats. Gain the tools and certifications to stay ahead of evolving CVE threats.

Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Recently Published CVEs