CVE-2024-11652: Detailed Vulnerability Analysis and Overview

Status: Analyzed - Last modified: 10-12-2024 Published: 25-11-2024

CVE-2024-11652
Vulnerability Scoring

4.7
/10

Attack Complexity Details

  • Attack Complexity: Low Impact
  • Attack Vector: NETWORK
  • Privileges Required: HIGH IMPACT
  • Scope: UNCHANGED
  • User Interaction: NONE

CIA Impact Definition

  • Confidentiality: Low Impact
  • Integrity: Low Impact
  • Availability: Low Impact

CVE-2024-11652 Vulnerability Summary

A vulnerability was found in EnGenius ENH1350EXT, ENS500-AC and ENS620EXT up to 20241118. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/sn_package/sn_https. The manipulation of the argument https_enable leads to command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Need help fixing CVEs? Check out our Step-by-Step Guide on How to Fix CVEs.

Access Complexity Graph for CVE-2024-11652

Impact Analysis for CVE-2024-11652

CVE-2024-11652: Detailed Information and External References

EPSS

0.00193

EPSS %

0.57036

References

0.00193

CWE

CWE-77

CAPEC

0.00193

  • LDAP Injection: An attacker manipulates or crafts an LDAP query for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some applications use user input to create LDAP queries that are processed by an LDAP server. For example, a user might provide their username during authentication and the username might be inserted in an LDAP query during the authentication process. An attacker could use this input to inject additional commands into an LDAP query that could disclose sensitive information. For example, entering a * in the aforementioned query might return information about all users on the system. This attack is very similar to an SQL injection attack in that it manipulates a query to gather additional information or coerce a particular return value.
  • Command Delimiters: An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
  • IMAP/SMTP Command Injection: An adversary exploits weaknesses in input validation on web-mail servers to execute commands on the IMAP/SMTP server. Web-mail servers often sit between the Internet and the IMAP or SMTP mail server. User requests are received by the web-mail servers which then query the back-end mail server for the requested information and return this response to the user. In an IMAP/SMTP command injection attack, mail-server commands are embedded in parts of the request sent to the web-mail server. If the web-mail server fails to adequately sanitize these requests, these commands are then sent to the back-end mail server when it is queried by the web-mail server, where the commands are then executed. This attack can be especially dangerous since administrators may assume that the back-end server is protected against direct Internet access and therefore may not secure it adequately against the execution of malicious commands.
  • Command Injection: An adversary looking to execute a command of their choosing, injects new items into an existing command thus modifying interpretation away from what was intended. Commands in this context are often standalone strings that are interpreted by a downstream component and cause specific responses. This type of attack is possible when untrusted values are used to build these command strings. Weaknesses in input validation or command construction can enable the attack and lead to successful exploitation.
  • Manipulating Writeable Terminal Devices: This attack exploits terminal devices that allow themselves to be written to by other users. The attacker sends command strings to the target terminal device hoping that the target user will hit enter and thereby execute the malicious command with their privileges. The attacker can send the results (such as copying /etc/passwd) to a known directory and collect once the attack has succeeded.
  • Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers: An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
  • Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files: Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.
  • Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls: An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.

Vulnerable Configurations

  • cpe:2.3:o:engeniustech:enh1350ext_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:engeniustech:enh1350ext_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:engeniustech:enh1350ext:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:engeniustech:enh1350ext:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:engeniustech:ens500-ac_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:engeniustech:ens500-ac_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:engeniustech:eens500-ac:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:engeniustech:eens500-ac:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:o:engeniustech:ens620ext_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:o:engeniustech:ens620ext_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:h:engeniustech:ens620ext:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:h:engeniustech:ens620ext:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

CVSS3 Source

cna@vuldb.com

CVSS3 Type

Secondary

CVSS3 Vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Protect Your Infrastructure: Combat Critical CVE Threats

Stay updated with real-time CVE vulnerabilities and take action to secure your systems. Enhance your cybersecurity posture with the latest threat intelligence and mitigation techniques. Develop the skills necessary to defend against CVEs and secure critical infrastructures. Join the top cybersecurity professionals safeguarding today's infrastructures.

Recently Published CVEs